How Trump’s Border Adjustment Tax Could Affect Canada

A US Border Tax Could ‘Trump’ NAFTA

High anxiety in Canadian boardrooms as US Government Embraces protectionism

It’s now official. Donald Trump is President of the United States, ushered in to the West Wing amid all the pomp and ceremony the world’s greatest superpower could muster.

Now the world waits to see how aggressively The Donald comes out swinging, and nowhere is that anxiety more keenly felt than in the countries of Canada and Mexico. The new president ran and won on his promises to preserve and restore jobs in the American heartland, and among the measures he proposed was the renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

However, it’s another lesser known measure that really has Canadian exporters worried, a protectionist tactic being touted by Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan known as the Border Adjustment Tax. Thus far the new Disrupter in Chief has not supported Ryan’s initiative, calling it “too complicated,” but Trump has repeatedly announced (or, in his case, Tweeted) his intention to impose some type of border tax.

As one example, Toyota shares fell when the then-President elect tweeted, “Toyota Motor said will build a new plant in Baja, Mexico, to build Corolla cars for U.S. NO WAY! Build plant in U.S. or pay big border tax.”

So, what is the Border Adjustment Tax, and how could it affect Canada? How can it affect your investments, and which industries are most at risk?

How Trump’s Border Adjustment Tax Could Affect Canada

Ironically, the BAT is not a trade policy but part of a sweeping array of corporate tax reforms being pushed by Ryan and Kevin Brady, chair of the House Ways and Means Committee. The BAT would include a massive cut to the corporate tax rate from 35 per cent to only 20 per cent. More importantly for Canada, the plan includes measures to make the cost of imports non-deductible, while capital investments or inputs from domestic sources would be fully deductible.

How does that impact Canadian industry?

Well, if a US company buys any type of product from another US company as an input either to their own production or for final sale to US consumers, they can write off the entire amount of that purchase.

The same purchase from a Canadian company would NOT be deductible, resulting in what amounts to a 20 per cent tariff on imports from Canada, or anywhere else, for that matter. This measure would affect approximately $400 billion worth of Canadian exports, ranging from raw minerals, oil, softwood lumber, software, auto parts, and even energy exports.

On the other side of the coin, the measures call for a 100 per cent tax deduction for the revenue American companies earn when exporting products to other countries. In short, US companies are rewarded for exporting products abroad, but penalized heavily when they buy products from foreign sources.

The impact of such a measure would be incredibly broad. Softwood lumber used to build American homes would be hit. Oil powering US industry would be hit. Software programs used to run American industrial processes would be affected. In short, pretty much any Canadian export used in the US production chain would be impacted by this measure.

Let’s take oil as an example.

If a US refinery buys domestic crude at $50 USD a barrel and sells the refined product at $60 USD, the refinery pays taxes ONLY on the $10 profit margin. If the same refinery buys the oil from Canada, it can not deduct the cost of the foreign oil, and pays tax on ALL of the $60 USD selling price. To keep it simple, the refinery buying US oil pays $2 tax per barrel, while the refinery buying oil from the Canadian Oil Patch would pay $12, or six times as much.

The same math applies to pretty much any Canadian export that becomes an input in the American supply chain … and that is terrifying for both Canadian exporters and a federal government facing its own issues with job creation.

The question hanging out there is how likely it is that Trump and his new Cabinet would support such a measure, and the answer is … complex. It is, after all, American politics. Trump stunned the Ryan-Brady camp when he told the Wall Street Journal he may oppose the BAT because it is too complicated, and it may have negative impacts on both job creation and exports. Trump is also worried by predictions from economists that imposing the BAT would cause the dollar to soar by 20 per cent, hurting US exports and the tourism industry.

However, the BAT is the lynchpin of the Republicans’ ‘Better Way’ package of proposed tax reforms, and having the Republican president announce he opposes the core of those reforms has put the party brass into a flurry of internal lobbying and arm twisting. Despite that pressure Trump’s nominee for Treasury Steven Mnuchin told the Senate during his confirmation hearings that the Trump team does not support an across-the-board border adjustment tax.

“When he’s referred to a border tax, he’s referred to a small number of companies that have moved their jobs or are moving their jobs, putting products back into the United States, and taxing them,” said Mnuchin. “So he has in no way contemplated a broad 35-per-cent border tax. That couldn’t be further from anything he’d possibly consider.”

Those comments had Canadian officials and exporters breathing a qualified sigh of relief, but there are still worries about Trump’s intentions regarding his renegotiating NAFTA, implementing a more limited border tax, or even caving to the large Republican contingent that is backing the ‘Better Way’ package. Some Republicans are pointing out that Trump can’t simply target individual companies with border taxes; such actions have to be part of a policy that applies equally to all.

Also, while Trump’s cabinet may not support the BAT, their Commander in Chief made it very clear in his inaugural address that America’s trading partners can expect some big changes. “From this moment on, it’s going to be America First,” Trump said in his first speech as President. “Every decision on trade, on taxes, on immigration, on foreign affairs, will be made to benefit American workers and American families.”

While no one in power north of the border is talking much, other than sending friendly notes to Trump via the Canadian ambassador in DC, options are being weighed to combat any attempt to circumnavigate the NAFTA agreement through implementation of a border adjustment tax. These include a variety of options from taking the case to the World Trade Organization as a violation of NAFTA, to fast tracking projects or discussions that could open up new trade routes. For example, if you’re wondering why the Liberals are so keen on politically controversial projects such as the Kinder Morgan pipeline, it’s partly because that pipeline allows Canada to push more oil to China and other trade partners in the Far East.

With so much uncertainty, it’s difficult for investors to confidently place their bets, and a chill has already settled in both Mexico and Canada, shown most clearly by the drop in the peso and the loonie after Trump’s Twitter announcements on NAFTA and a new border tax. In all, it’s a time for investors to watch and listen carefully while considering investments in companies that focus heavily on exports to the United States.

By Gary Symons, Equedia

Equedia
The Equedia Letter is Canada’s fastest growing and largest investment newsletter dedicated to revealing the truths about the stock market.