I was watching the US presidential debate this week and there’s no doubt that Romney won this round. Regardless, it was obvious the main topic of discussion was unemployment.
Coincidently, one hour before market open, and on the day of the debate, the Employment Situation Summary was released.
The bureau’s survey of businesses showed a mediocre rise of 114,000 in nonfarm employment, yet the unemployment rate had somehow dropped from 8.1% to 7.8 percent, based on the household survery which concluded 873,000 found work. This not only matches the rate when Obama took office, but it far exceeded expectations. It also marks the first time since January 2009 that the rate has been below 8 percent.
If the numbers are correct, this would be great news for the US economy…and great news for Obama supporters.
But are the numbers real?
Furthermore, where did they come from?
How Job Numbers are Derived
The Employment Situation Summary actually comes from two very different surveys.
One is a survey that asks 60,000 households about their employment status. It’s called the Current Population Survey (CPS), or “Household Survey.” Using those numbers, the bureau concluded that an additional 873,000 people had found work in September. This is the number that was used to bring the unemployment rate from 8.1 percent to 7.8 percent.
The US labour force is well over 150 million. How does a survey of 60,000 households make sense?
The other survey is called the Current Employment Statistics survey (CES), or “Payroll Survey”, and it’s based on a sample of 160,000 businesses and government agencies, as opposed to households, that represent 400,000 individual employers. This survey measures only non-agricultural and nonsupervisory employment; thus, it does not technically calculate an unemployment rate. That’s where the 114,000 additional jobs come from.
One survey says 114,000, while the other says 873,000.
Not only were the job numbers coincidently positive, the bureau revised figures for July and August, and said that more jobs had been created than it originally estimated. Even people with only high school degrees were finding jobs and the number of people who had been out of work for six months or more was at its lowest point in three years.
So if all of these people are back to work, then everything is getting back to normal, right? Maybe all of this printing is actually helping people get back to work. Or is it?
Another Record High
Late after the market close on the day of the debate, the department of agriculture released a stunning report.
Food stamp usage for both persons and households, has now hit an all new record high. A record 46.68 million Americans received food stamps in July. They blamed this dramatic rise on local weather disasters in Ohio, Maryland and West Virginia; yet this number has been rising nonstop month after month.
The cost of the food stamp program has more than doubled in the last four years to a record $75.7 billion in the 12 months ended Sept. 30, 2011; it is the department’s biggest annual expense.
Whether you believe the jobs numbers or not, it really doesn’t matter. What matters is where the stock market is headed.
Luckily, I think Obama will do everything in his power to keep the markets going until he gets re-elected. And if he does, we may have further room to climb (as I said last week, Wall Street does best when we have a Democratic president with a counterbalance of a GOP-led Congress.)
While both Romney and Obama diligently debated how they will solve the unemployment issue, neither of them directly addressed the deficit or the growing debt.
Why? Because neither candidates have an answer. Wait, yes they do: Print.
If you think the US is going to stop printing anytime soon, you’re absolutely wrong. It doesn’t matter who is placed on the throne, printing is the only survival method left.
I am not saying it’s the right thing to do, but those who say there are alternatives are wrong – unless you count absolute economic collapse or a complete restructuring of the monetary system (i.e. gold-backed dollar), alternatives.
Race to Debase
For the last 30 years, the two superpowers of the world (China and the US) have endlessly debased their currencies. I have explained this numerous times in past letters. As a result, the rest of the world has joined in order to avoid disaster on their home turfs. It’s no longer a two-way street. Debasing is now a globalized phenomenon.
The word globalization has now turned into a battle of currency debasement and inflation exportation. I call it a currency war. Politicians call it globalization.
But what happens when the world has printed so much debt that countries can no longer export inflation to competitors? The end result of this path is simple: Uncontrollable inflation.
This won’t happen overnight. And as I said many times before, inflation shouldn’t keep you up at night when you’re investing in stocks, as a company’s earnings and revenue will generally grow to reflect that. Just look at the last few years – we’re back to the highs before the 2008 crash. The S&P is back to 1461; just 39 points shy of my 1500 call earlier this year.
(It’s funny how those who laughed at me for calling such a number, are now telling me they knew this would happen. Hindsight is a beautiful thing.)
A few years from now when a combo meal at McDonald’s costs more than $10 dollars, you’re going to understand why it’s there.
Food for Thought
The dollar fell once again, despite strong jobs numbers.
The American QE weapon is working.
Russia, the only major emerging market to raise interest rates this year, is once again hurt by inflation as a result of the American printing press. Inflation rose the fastest in 10 months, soaring passed the target range. Central bank First Deputy Chairman Alexei Ulyukayev said ladt week that inflation risks remain greater than the threat of an economic slowdown.
Brazil, who had no issues calling out the Americans’ currency tactics, is also getting killed by the American printing press. Brazil’s annual inflation accelerated in September for the third straight month. For a country that has already experienced hyperinflation in the past, this is a major concern for the Brazilian economy.
As for Canadians, inflationary pressures remain weak according to data. But don’t be fooled. Just because gas prices have dropped slightly, doesn’t mean we’re doing better. We know everything is overly expensive. Want proof? I pay more than CDN$1.50/litre for gas – that’s roughly $5.70/gallon. The US average is US$3.80. So if Americans are complaining about high gas prices, imagine how Canadians feel – especially since Canada is one of the largest oil producers in the world.
If inflationary pressures are weak now, I would hate to see what happens if they show up. Housing prices in Canada are already far too high and if the benchmark interest rates rise as a result of inflationary pressures, watch home prices tumble further.
What About Gold?
What about it? It’s an absolute must in my portfolio. That won’t change. Gold prices haven’t been growing lately, but their demand fundamentals have.
(FYI, trading of commodities on the NYSE Liffe exchanges in London and Paris was halted on two separate occasions this Friday due to a “technical issue” – that’s the second time this week.)
Last month, investors bought 85.4 metric tons – that’s the most metal ever held through gold-backed ETF’s since July 2011. The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission shows that Hedge fund bets on a gold rally are the biggest in seven months.
Keep in mind that October is generally a down month for gold. If it dips, it’s a buying opportunity in my eyes. I expect gold to climb very soon. It may be sparked by the announcement of China’s mass accumalation. It may be sparked by inflationary pressures. Either way, the spark will come.
Companies in our portfolio continue to succeed.
Balmoral Resources (TSX.V: BAR) (OTCQX: BALMF)
In the last week alone, Balmoral Resources (TSX.V: BAR)(OTCQX: BALMF) has closed $8 million in financing, resumed drilling at their flagship Martiniere property, and announced they continue to hit high grades practically everywhere they drill.
One of the recent holes from last week’s announcement intercepted 195.50 g/t gold over 0.97 metres, in the hanging wall above the Bug Lake Zone at less than 30 metres vertical depth. This structure may be similar to the recently announced bonanza grade Footwall discovery which returned 273 g/t gold over 3.88 metres.
For those who don’t remember, the Footwall discovery in August is the discovery that sent Balmoral share prices flying. More drill results from this area are coming. Anyone short on this stock may get bitten hard if Balmoral keeps this up. I am excited.
MAG Silver (TSX: MAG) (NYSE.A: MVG)
MAG Silver (TSX: MAG) (NYSE.A: MVG) just announced an initial mineral resource estimate at Cinco de Mayo, with inferred mineral resources estimated to be 12.45 million tonnes at 132 grams per tonne (“g/t”) (3.9 ounces per ton) silver, 0.24 g/t gold, 2.86% lead, and 6.47% zinc (9.33% lead plus zinc). Those are fantastic numbers.
This resource comes from the Bridge Zone/Jose Manto at Cinco de Mayo and doesn’t even include MAG’s latest discovery at the new Pegaso Zone. You should go back and read my report, to get a better scope of how big this really is.
I can’t wait to see the follow up results from their New Pegaso discovery. Given what I have already seen, I am expecting more barn burning results. If they follow their exploration model and link the Bridge Zone/Jose Manto to the new Pegaso Zone discovery at depth, we may soon see MAG’s 100% owned Cinco de Mayo project become what I said it would: An Absolute Monster.
More to Come
I am off next week to visit a gold project with the potential for near-term production. If all checks out, I’ll hopefully be presenting yet another winner to our readers.
Happy Thanksgiving to all Canadians.
Until next week,
Disclosure: I am long gold and silver through ETF’s and bullion, as well as long both major and junior gold and silver companies. We’re biased towards MAG Silver because they are an advertiser and we own shares. We’re biased towards Balmoral because they are an advertiser and we own shares. You can do the math. Our reputation is built upon the companies we feature. That is why we invest in every company we feature in our Equedia Reports, including MAG Silver and Balmoral Resources. It’s your money to invest and we don’t share in your profits or your losses, so please take responsibility for doing your own due diligence. Remember, past performance is not indicative of future performance. Just because many of the companies in our previous Equedia Reports have done well, doesn’t mean they all will.
Furthermore, MAG Silver, Balmoral Resources, and their management, have no control over our editorial content and any opinions expressed are those of our own. We’re not obligated to write a report on any of our advertisers and we’re not obligated to talk about them just because they advertise with us.
Further Disclaimer and Disclosure
Equedia.com & Equedia Network Corporation bears no liability for losses and/or damages arising from the use of this newsletter or any third party content provided herein. Equedia.com is an online financial newsletter owned by Equedia Network Corporation. We are focused on researching small-cap and large-cap public companies. Our past performance does not guarantee future results. Information in this report has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete. This material is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities or commodities.
Furthermore, to keep our reports and newsletters FREE, from time to time we may publish paid advertisements from third parties and sponsored companies. We are also compensated to perform research on specific companies and often act as consultants to many of the companies mentioned in this letter and on our website at equedia.com. We also make direct investments into many of these companies and own shares and/or options in them. Companies do pay us to advertise on our website and we often distribute our reports on featured companies. While we are never paid to write a rosy and positive report on any company, we do market our reports using the advertising fees paid for by our featured companies.
This process allows us to continue publishing high-quality investment ideas at no cost to you whatsoever. Our revenue is generated by sponsor companies and we grow our readership by using the advertising fees we charge to distribute our reports. This helps both Equedia and our client companies gain exposure and allows us to provide you with our research at no cost.
Therefore, information should not be construed as unbiased. Each contract varies in duration, services performed and compensation received.
If you ever have any questions or concerns about our business or publications, we encourage you to contact us at the email or phone number below. Equedia.com is not responsible for any claims made by any of the mentioned companies or third party content providers. You should independently investigate and fully understand all risks before investing. We are not a registered broker-dealer or financial advisor. Before investing in any securities, you should consult with your financial advisor and a registered broker-dealer. The information and data in this report were obtained from sources considered reliable. Their accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed and the giving of the same is not to be deemed as an offer or solicitation on our part with respect to the sale or purchase of any securities or commodities. Any decision to purchase or sell as a result of the opinions expressed in this report OR ON Equedia.com will be the full responsibility of the person authorizing such transaction.
Equedia Network Corporation is also a distributor (and not a publisher) of content supplied by third parties and Subscribers. Accordingly, Equedia Network Corporation has no more editorial control over such content than does a public library, bookstore, or newsstand. Any opinions, advice, statements, services, offers, or other information or content expressed or made available by third parties, including information providers, Subscribers or any other user of the Equedia Network Corporation Network of Sites, are those of the respective author(s) or distributor(s) and not of Equedia Network Corporation. Neither Equedia Network Corporation nor any third-party provider of information guarantees the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any content, nor its merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose.