*If you have not already subscribed to our weekly interactive newsletter, please visit: http://equedia.com/newsletter/
For the full interactive edition, please follow this link: CLICK HERE
Every junior miner strives to become a producer, or to be bought out.
Both of these paths take a lot of financing and dilution before the end goal. It takes much more than just some drill holes to succeed.
The hard truth is, mining exploration and development is a negative cash flow business.
Juniors need to continually raise money for the many processes involved in bringing a mine to life. They need to drill enough holes to gain enough interest from the majors for a buyout. This ultimately leads to further dilution.
Many will fail.
But what if there is a junior that is cash flow positive before production?
What if there was a company with revenues nearing $16 million in their previous year?
What if there was a company with an 80% interest in a property with over $12 million in expenditures in the last two years, a 43-101 resource, a historical “reserve” sitting between two of the world’s largest silver mines, and expecting production in Q1 of 2011*? What if they were fully permitted and fully funded to begin production?
Is there such a company?
There is. And it’s our first silver featured company for 2010:
United Mining Group (CNSX: UMG)
First off, United Mining Group (CNSX: UMG) currently trades on the CNSX (The Canadian National Stock Exchange) which means you are more than likely going to have to call your broker or online discount broker to get more information.
We feel this is one of the major reasons why this company has yet to receive any major media attention – but it will – especially once you hear their story.
Don’t take the CNSX lightly.
Many companies, including the likes of Evolving Gold, also started on the CNSX. As a matter of fact, Evolving Gold began trading on the CNSX with a market cap of $3 million just 3 years ago. It now trades on the TSX Venture with a market cap of over $110 million.
Most of the Canadian (and many US) institutions can trade CNSX listed securities. Take a look at the list here: Click Here for List
Regardless of the exchange, the United Mining Group (CNSX: UMG) has one heck of a story to tell.
The Battle for Land
Silver has been a very heated topic for us. And if you have been following the major silver headlines, you must have heard about the recent fight over one of the world’s richest, past-producing silver properties:
The Sunshine Mine
The Sunshine Mine is located in northern Idaho’s historic Coeur d’Alene district, famously dubbed,” The Silver Valley.”
click for bigger size
And with good reason…
The Silver Valley is the world’s 2nd largest silver district, producing over one billion ounces of silver.
Since its discovery in 1884, the Sunshine Silver Mine alone produced over 328 million ounces of silver grading 23 opt (ounces per tonne). To date, it is believed to still have resources in excess of over 260 million ounces left for mining.
Last month, the heated battle for the Sunshine Mine was finally won by Silver Opportunity Partners, a company backed by multi-billionaire Thomas Kaplan.
Thomas Kaplan has deep pockets. Very deep. He is also known to be extremely aggressive when he sees a resource investment opportunity he likes. Having a guy like Thomas Kaplan take over the Sunshine mine is great news for the Silver Valley. He can trigger some much needed life into one of the world`s most promising silver properties – and those directly around it.
Although the Sunshine mine remains one of the key components of this district, it still has many issues. Despite having 260 million plus ounces left to be mined, much of the Sunshine Mine`s silver may never be recovered because of the mess the previous owners left when they mined it.
Like gold mines, if you start producing without understanding the resource, you can significantly ruin your mineable ore – the same goes for silver mines.
The Sunshine mine also has a NSR issue (up to 7%) with the EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) which may put a serious damper on the profitability of the mine. With that being said, there must be obvious reasons why multi-billionaire Thomas Kaplan made the move to outbid everyone for the Sunshine.
Here’s where it gets interesting.
Right next door to the Sunshine, lies United Mining Group`s (CNSX: UMG) Crescent Mine.
The Crescent Mine is located immediately between, and along strike, of both the Sunshine and Bunker Hill mines. The Sunshine and Bunker Hill mines have produced nearly half of the Silver Valley`s historical production of One Billion Ounces!
click for bigger size
The Crescent Mine is also a past producer, producing 25 million ounces of silver at 27 opt. It already hosts an indicated resource of 6.1 million ounces silver consisting of 324,000 tons grading 18.7 ounces silver per ton and an additional inferred resource of 4.1 million ounces silver consisting of 211,000 tons grading 19.5 ounces silver per ton. But it also hosts a historical reserve calculation of 9,397,050 ounces of silver (non-43-101 compliant).
By today`s measures, it has the highest grade ore in the Silver Valley.
Yet it remains mostly untouched.
With over 5000′ vertical feet of historic stoping and more than 6000′ of prospective strike length along 12 separate veins between two world class mines, the Crescent has excellent potential to produce for many times the 5-10 year mine life based on the existing resource.
More than $12 million has been spent on the Crescent Mine in the last two years on surface/underground drilling and mine rehabilitation. Much of this work was actually conducted by United Mining Group (CNSX: UMG), so you can bet they understand this property better than anyone else.
To reap the benefits of the Crescent, United Mining Group (CNSX: UMG) only had to give up $220,000, some shares of its stock, and spend $9 million over 3 years to earn and keep their 80% interest in this property (see NI 43-101 for more details).
Did we mention that the Crescent Mine project is already fully permitted and financed for phase 1 production in Q4 2010 – Q1 2011*?
That’s right, United Mining Group (CNSX: UMG) already has the permits in place and the money they need to bring the mine into production.
When you consider the issues of the Sunshine Mine, it would make sense for Thomas Kaplan to also own the Crescent Mine. The Crescent Mine is not only easier to mine, but should be much faster and cheaper to bring back into production.
We’re not sure exactly what Mr. Kaplan’s intentions are, but with just over $55 million shares outstanding and a market cap of just over $36 million, United Mining Group (CNSX: UMG) would be an easy target for Kaplan if he wanted to take control.
But there’s a lot more juice to this story.
Aside from their interest in the Crescent Mine and the fact that they are already permitted and funded to go into production with the next year, United Mining Group (CNSX: UMG) also owns and operates a mine services company.
They Make Money!
In 2009 alone, United Mining Group (CNSX: UMG) made close to $16 million in revenue and was profitable!
Their compound annual growth in revenue was 77% from 2007 to the end of 2009. Seriously, there aren’t many juniors out there that can say that. Heck, there aren’t many companies with $200 million plus market caps that can say that.
Furthermore, their projected revenue for 2011 is expected to grow to $30M in 2011, as the Crescent Mine is brought into production. This means that at current prices, United Mining Group (CNSX:UMG) will have an annual revenue nearing their own current market cap.
That is almost unheard of in the mining world – or any sectors for that matter.
When you consider the comparables, the differences are shocking.
The Lowest Market Cap?
Many comparable companies with the same production, resource, and revenue profiles have market cap values in excess of $150 – $200 million plus. United Mining Group (CNSX: UMG) is nowhere near those numbers. Its much, much lower.
Let’s take a look at Alexco Resource Corp** (TSX: AXR), for example.
Alexco Resource, like UMG, has an environmental and mine services company that produces revenue, in addition to their silver exploration and mining division with a high grade silver property. So it makes sense to use them as a comparable.
Alexco currently has a market cap in excess of $185 million.
United Mining Group (CNSX: UMG) has a market cap of $36 millon.
Alexco expects to have revenues of $20 million in the next 5 years with their environmental services division.
United Mining Group (CNSX: UMG) already had revenues of well over $15 million last year.
Alexco has just over 13 million ounces of silver in their resource calculations.
United Mining Group (CNSX: UMG) has just over 10 million ounces of 43-101 resources (indicated resource of 6.1 million ounces silver consisting of 324,000 tons grading 18.7 ounces silver per ton and an additional inferred resource of 4.1 million ounces silver consisting of 211,000 tons grading 19.5 ounces silver per ton.)
Both are targeting a 100 million ounce silver deposit.
As you can see, when compared to many of the other silver juniors in the market, United Mining Group (CNSX: UMG) has a market value substantially less than its peers.
If you know of any other companies with a market cap similar to United Mining Group (CNSX: UMG), with a similar world class property, and making in excess of $15 million before production, and fully permitted and funded to go into production within a year, let us know – because we haven’t found it.
From drill shot potential plays capable of multi baggers to world-renowned management teams, our featured companies all have their unique situation worthy of our portfolio.
This time, we’re giving you United Mining Group (CNSX: UMG) from the beginning – truly from the beginning. They officially begin trading this coming Monday.
United Mining Group (CNSX: UMG): Try and find a similar story.
Until next week,
Call Us Toll Free: 1-888-EQUEDIA (378-3342)
*The planning for this production is based on recently completed drill results, underground work, ongoing mine planning and historical mine workings in the immediate area of the proposed production. The Company has not completed a preliminary assessment as defined by NI 43-101 or a pre-feasibility study with respect to the Crescent Silver Mine.
**Alexco Resource facts and figures are based on their March 1, 2010 Coporate Power Point presentation and information derived from their website.
For the full interactive newsletter and report, please follow this link: http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs005/1102243211822/archive/1103502398819.html
If you have not already subscribed to Equedia Weekly, you may sign up here: http://equedia.com/newsletter/
This Newsletter and report contains forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements are statements which relate to future events. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “should”, “expects”, “plans, “anticipates”, believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential”, or “continue or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.
While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect out current judgment regarding the direction of our business, actual results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future performance suggests herein. Except as required by applicable law the companies in this report do not intend to update any forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.
Disclaimer and Disclosure
Disclaimer and Disclosure Equedia.com & Equedia Network Corporation bears no liability for losses and/or damages arising from the use of this newsletter or any third party content provided herein. Equedia.com is an online financial newsletter owned by Equedia Network Corporation. We are focused on researching small-cap and large-cap public companies. Our past performance does not guarantee future results. Information in this report has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete. This material is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities or commodities.
Equedia.com has been compensated to perform research on specific companies and therefore information should not be construed as unbiased. Each contract varies in duration, services performed and compensation received. Equedia.com is not responsible for any claims made by any of the mentioned companies or third party content providers. You should independently investigate and fully understand all risks before investing. We are not a registered broker-dealer or financial advisor. Before investing in any securities, you should consult with your financial advisor and a registered broker-dealer. The information and data in this report were obtained from sources considered reliable. Their accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed and the giving of the same is not to be deemed as an offer or solicitation on our part with respect to the sale or purchase of any securities or commodities. Any decision to purchase or sell as a result of the opinions expressed in this report OR ON Equedia.com will be the full responsibility of the person authorizing such transaction.